The
Covid-19 Election
The
Democratic base is once again being led to coalesce around the “safe”
establishment candidate. We constantly hear that we must support the
establishment candidate or there will be another 4 years of Trump.
This creates the makings of another catastrophic election year
unless the two halves of the Democratic base come together.
There’s
an old saw that nobody
cares how much you know until they know how much you care.
I have been watching both Bernie groups and establishment Democrat
groups on Facebook for
the last few years,
and there is definitely a lack of understanding. The Bernie group
understands Biden’s positions and what they will mean for them.
They have grown up under and live with the effects of those policies.
Unfortunately, I do not see much understanding going
the other way.
This gap was recently driven home when the Affordable Care Act was
brought up in a conversation.
The
ACA was enacted when I was in graduate school. At the time, I was
living on student loans with
little disposable income. That meant the only option was a garbage
plan under the ACA that covered nearly nothing. I used it once for a
basic physical, and was still hit with a few hundred dollars in
co-pays and lab bills, despite telling the doctor outright that I did
not want those excessive, expensive, and unnecessary tests. A few
months later, when I was hit by a car on my bike, I refused to go to
the ER because I knew how horrible my insurance plan was.
I
had never really thought much about my ACA experience until that
conversation. Looking back, the ACA was worse than nothing for me.
If I had no insurance, then at least I would have saved the premium
cost and avoided outrageous medical bills. Since I had to pay for
that out of student loans, I am still paying for that and will be for
years to come. My experience is not unique.
This
is also the experience of millions of Gen X-ers and Millennials. The
Boomer generation has fared better because they were better off
financially from the start. That is our society in a nutshell: if
you had it ok before, you're allowed to maintain
an
average life, but if you had it tough before, it never gets better.
Upward
mobility in America has dropped significantly because of the failures
in our system.
i
Our
healthcare system is one of the largest of those failures. So on it goes, becoming
consistently, gradually worse. If we don't begin to bridge this
understanding gap, then there will be 4 more years of Twitler for
sure.
The
younger voters that are Bernie's base have been told to accept
incremental improvements for decades by the establishment, but those
improvements never materialized. Instead, the incremental change
they have experienced has been backwards and consistently makes
life worse, not better. How many more decades do they have to wait
for a system with some basic fairness? Even the ACA, lauded by the
likes of Biden, has been an utter failure for younger generations. Unless and until the Democratic establishment comes to realize this,
there will never be unity within the party.
The
Bernie people I know are liberals who are willing to hold their noses
and vote for a Democrat only if they fight for positions like Bernie
does. The further away from those positions, the less likely that
they will find that person worthy of their vote. We are taught in
America that it is a politician’s duty to not only represent, but
to effectively advocate for policies that reflect our values. If a
politician fails to promise to fight for our values, or fails to
deliver on their promises, then constituents are under no obligation
to continue supporting that failed politician. The younger
generations are not serfs owing a fealty tribute to a manor or party
overlord. They are citizens, and, if you want their votes, you must
earn them.
Some
Millenials see healthcare as a universal right. Others are more
pragmatic and argue that it is simply
more economically efficient to get rid of the bloated bureaucracy of
insurance companies. The
overwhelming bulk of studies on US healthcare support this argument.
ii
iii
Whichever
path you choose, though, the Coronavirus makes it necessary.
Now
that Coronavirus is a major issue in this election, healthcare is
front and center. I had to refuse healthcare when I was injured,
laying on the street, and barely able to move because my Obamacare
plan was so awful. Refusing
care was not an option when
I was suddenly hit with enteritis on a southbound train from Bangkok somewhere in the rural Thailand; neither is it optional for
Covid-19. iv Now, millions of un- and
under-insured
are facing the same reality if they become infected with Covid-19.
Do they go to the hospital and risk losing everything, including
their homes, or do they tough it out and risk death? Even worse,
there are already some people who were sick with the virus and denied
care because they did not have insurance. At
least one teenager has died because he had no insurance and was
denied care.
v
Yet,
Biden
is still against universal healthcare.
vi
Biden
is heralded as the safe candidate, but the Corona-virus makes us all
unsafe. Having uninsured and undiagnosed Americans walking around
with a deadly and highly transmissible virus because they cannot afford healthcare is a threat to
everyone.
How many of our fellow Americans are we willing to kill off in order
to continue this obviously failed system? How many of our family and
friends are we willing to let die just to maintain a system that, by
all objective accounts,
has been the worldwide worst at containing the disease? vii
The
Democratic party has already broken
their own rules by letting an unqualified billionaire on the debate
stage,
and people in the Bernie camp are rightly infuriated.
Those
underhanded maneuvers are what caused the 2016 DemExit, but now it's
worse. The people that bolted last time are already on the way out,
and I'm afraid even more will follow this time. The old guard has
refused to listen, so the younger generations are refusing to lend
their support to a party that has no problem killing them off to
maintain corporate profits. Their shenanigans may have brought them power within the party, but it will not bring them votes in the general election. Only a true platform of reform will do that.
Now
is the time to listen. Yet we hear the establishment say that now is
not the time; that they
will do an after-action report when the threat has subsided and learn
the lessons then. viii
The younger generations have seen that line a million times: you
have to change incrementally, slow and steady. But there is no time
to wait until after the Coronavirus threat abates. People are
already dying. Universal healthcare is a deal-breaker because
Covid-19 is a death sentence for the uninsured — either immediately because they cannot get treated, or belatedly from a life mired in medical debt and bankruptcy that forecloses opportunities for a better life just because someone got sick once. Because the younger
generations have been misled and told to wait for decades, they will
not believe any politician with a history of not forcefully arguing
for universal healthcare. If the candidate will not change his platform, then the party must change the candidate or lose. Further, they have no obligation to vote
for a candidate who is willing to kill them off in support of a
failed system. For them, this is not merely a political issue — it
is life or death. Do not expect them to fall in line behind a
candidate that is willing to sacrifice them for corporate profits.
Even
Trump was smart enough to promise some sort of universal healthcare.
He was lying, as anyone with half a brain knew, but at least he said
it. In 2016, not supporting universal health care was a
deal-breaker. With Covid-19, it’s a no-brainer. A failure to
understand this will ensure the Democratic nominee also fails to
capture the White House. A failure to understand is a plan to fail.
So,
to the Democrat establishment, the choice is yours. The younger
generations see that maintaining the status quo ante will only lead
to bankruptcy, misery, and death for them. Why would they bother
voting for that?
ihttps://www.forbes.com/sites/aparnamathur/2018/07/16/the-u-s-does-poorly-on-yet-another-metric-of-economic-mobility/#157945c56a7b
iihttps://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/484301-22-studies-agree-medicare-for-all-saves-money
iii
Some criticize Bernie’s use of the lower of Mercatus’ 2
figures. For example, they claim that doctors would be forced
to accept 40% less in reimbursements. Maybe so, but that
conveniently ignores the cost savings that the doctor’s offices
would see by not being forced to keep multiple insurance billing
specialists on the payroll. Private health insurance companies
have very complicated payment systems and they frequently change
their system with no notice to care providers. This results in lost
revenues every time a change is made.
In contrast, the Medicare system is very straight forward. One insurance billing specialist I used to know estimated that, for her mid-size hospital that serves a metro area of about 100,000 people, the hospital could drop from 3.5 billing specialists to 1 under a Medicare-style billing system. Not only would that result in substantially fewer denied payments, it would also save the hospital a hundred grand or so every year in unnecessary employee costs. That does not even count how many private practices would be able to reduce their labor costs as well.
From what I can see, those replies that fail to consider these costs that are littered throughout our system into account smack of being either incompetent or disingenuous. I’ll leave it to the reader to decide which.
If you’d like to see this story written up with better numbers, please leave a comment below. If there’s interest, I will contact the billing specialist and see if I can get better numbers to write it up.
In contrast, the Medicare system is very straight forward. One insurance billing specialist I used to know estimated that, for her mid-size hospital that serves a metro area of about 100,000 people, the hospital could drop from 3.5 billing specialists to 1 under a Medicare-style billing system. Not only would that result in substantially fewer denied payments, it would also save the hospital a hundred grand or so every year in unnecessary employee costs. That does not even count how many private practices would be able to reduce their labor costs as well.
From what I can see, those replies that fail to consider these costs that are littered throughout our system into account smack of being either incompetent or disingenuous. I’ll leave it to the reader to decide which.
If you’d like to see this story written up with better numbers, please leave a comment below. If there’s interest, I will contact the billing specialist and see if I can get better numbers to write it up.
vhttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11270647/first-us-child-to-die-of-coronavirus-was-denied-urgent-care-because-he-didnt-have-insurance/
Note:
while the health officials are trying to sow doubt and claim he may
have had underlying conditions, it is reported that he did test
positive for the virus after he died. We reject that spin. This kid
was refused the last chance he had for lifesaving treatment because
he did not have insurance. Period.
vihttps://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/coronavirus-crisis-hasn-t-changed-joe-biden-s-mind-medicare-n1172361
viii Considering
how fundamentally incompetently this administration has handled the
virus, we all should be outraged, but that’s a rant for another
day.
No comments:
Post a Comment